1964 Holden EK vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (385 HP) has 320 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (515 Nm) has 355 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EK | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Holden | Jaguar |
| Model | EK | XF |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 385 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 515 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1877 mm |
