1964 Holden EK vs. 2012 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2012 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (141 HP) has 76 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (330 Nm) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2012 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EK | 2012 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | EK | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 141 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1810 mm |
