1964 Holden EK vs. 2012 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2012 Toyota Tundra is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Tundra (381 HP) has 316 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Tundra (545 Nm) has 385 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2012 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EK | 2012 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Holden | Toyota |
| Model | EK | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 5663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 381 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 545 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2040 mm |
