1964 Holden EK vs. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (397 HP) has 332 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (565 Nm) has 405 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EK | 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE | |
| Make | Holden | Cadillac |
| Model | EK | ESCALADE |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 397 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 565 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2009 mm |
