1964 Holden EK vs. 2013 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XK is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XK (542 HP) has 477 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XK (681 Nm) has 521 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2013 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EK | 2013 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Holden | Jaguar |
Model | EK | XK |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 542 HP |
Torque | 160 Nm | 681 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2032 mm |