1964 Holden FB Special vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden FB Special. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden FB Special would be higher. At 4,964 cc, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK (355 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 291 more horse power than 1964 Holden FB Special. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden FB Special. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 615 kg more than 1964 Holden FB Special. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK (460 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 297 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden FB Special. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden FB Special.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden FB Special | 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Make | Holden | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | FB Special | CLK |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 4964 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 355 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 460 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1715 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2720 mm |