1964 Holden FB Special vs. 2005 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2005 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden FB Special. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden FB Special would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden FB Special is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1964 Holden FB Special. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden FB Special. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 185 kg more than 1964 Holden FB Special. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden FB Special. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden FB Special.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden FB Special | 2005 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | FB Special | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2540 mm |