1964 Holden FB Special vs. 2012 Nissan Leaf
To start off, 2012 Nissan Leaf is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden FB Special. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden FB Special would be higher.
Because 1964 Holden FB Special is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Holden FB Special. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Leaf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden FB Special | 2012 Nissan Leaf | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | FB Special | Leaf |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4445 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2700 mm |