1964 Honda F1 vs. 2010 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Honda F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Honda F1 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover (375 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1964 Honda F1. (217 HP @ 12000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1964 Honda F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 2080 kg more than 1964 Honda F1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Honda F1 | 2010 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Honda | Land Rover |
| Model | F1 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1495 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 375 HP |
| Engine RPM | 12000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 504 kg | 2584 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2878 mm |
