1964 Honda S500 vs. 2000 MCC ForTwo
To start off, 2000 MCC ForTwo is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Honda S500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Honda S500 would be higher. At 597 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 MCC ForTwo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 MCC ForTwo (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1964 Honda S500. (38 HP @ 8000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 MCC ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1964 Honda S500.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 MCC ForTwo (70 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Honda S500. (39 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 2000 MCC ForTwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Honda S500.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Honda S500 | 2000 MCC ForTwo | |
Make | Honda | MCC |
Model | S500 | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Body Type | Roadster | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 491 cc | 597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 39 Nm | 70 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3310 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1440 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 1810 mm |