1964 Honda S600 vs. 2009 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Honda S600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Honda S600 would be higher. At 2,519 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo C70 (227 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1964 Honda S600. (54 HP @ 8500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1964 Honda S600.
Because 1964 Honda S600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Honda S600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Honda S600 | 2009 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Honda | Volvo |
Model | S600 | C70 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 606 cc | 2519 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 54 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 8500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 54.5 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 93.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 18.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3340 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 62 L |