1964 Humber Super Snipe vs. 1976 Renault Rodeo
To start off, 1976 Renault Rodeo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 2,965 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 826 kg more than 1976 Renault Rodeo.
Because 1964 Humber Super Snipe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Humber Super Snipe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Renault Rodeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Humber Super Snipe | 1976 Renault Rodeo | |
| Make | Humber | Renault |
| Model | Super Snipe | Rodeo |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2965 cc | 845 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 680 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2410 mm |
