1964 Humber Super Snipe vs. 1990 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1990 Plymouth Sundance is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 2,965 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Humber Super Snipe (128 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1990 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Humber Super Snipe should accelerate faster than 1990 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 331 kg more than 1990 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Humber Super Snipe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Humber Super Snipe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Humber Super Snipe | 1990 Plymouth Sundance | |
Make | Humber | Plymouth |
Model | Super Snipe | Sundance |
Year Released | 1964 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2965 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2470 mm |