1964 Humber Super Snipe vs. 1997 Mazda SW-X
To start off, 1997 Mazda SW-X is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 401 kg more than 1997 Mazda SW-X.
Because 1964 Humber Super Snipe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Humber Super Snipe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mazda SW-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Mazda SW-X has automatic transmission and 1964 Humber Super Snipe has manual transmission. 1964 Humber Super Snipe will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Mazda SW-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Humber Super Snipe | 1997 Mazda SW-X | |
| Make | Humber | Mazda |
| Model | Super Snipe | SW-X |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 1105 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 55 L |
