1964 Humber Super Snipe vs. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (283 HP) has 155 more horse power than 1964 Humber Super Snipe. (128 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1964 Humber Super Snipe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 934 kg more than 1964 Humber Super Snipe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Humber Super Snipe. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Humber Super Snipe. (226 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Humber Super Snipe.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Humber Super Snipe | 2005 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Humber | Land Rover |
| Model | Super Snipe | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2965 cc | 4392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 283 HP |
| Torque | 226 Nm | 441 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.3 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82.6 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 2440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 100 L |
