1964 Humber Super Snipe vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 2,965 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 60 kg more than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Humber Super Snipe (226 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (158 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1964 Humber Super Snipe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Humber Super Snipe | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Humber | Toyota |
Model | Super Snipe | Condor |
Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2965 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 226 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.3 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.6 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 1446 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 70 L |