1964 Humber Super Snipe vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (261 HP) has 133 more horse power than 1964 Humber Super Snipe. (128 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1964 Humber Super Snipe.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (340 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Humber Super Snipe. (226 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Humber Super Snipe.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Humber Super Snipe | 2009 Holden UTE | |
Make | Humber | Holden |
Model | Super Snipe | UTE |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2965 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 261 HP |
Torque | 226 Nm | 340 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |