1964 Humber Super Snipe vs. 2012 Renault Fluence
To start off, 2012 Renault Fluence is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 2,965 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Fluence (140 HP) has 12 more horse power than 1964 Humber Super Snipe. (128 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Fluence should accelerate faster than 1964 Humber Super Snipe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 281 kg more than 2012 Renault Fluence.
Because 1964 Humber Super Snipe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Humber Super Snipe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Fluence, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Humber Super Snipe | 2012 Renault Fluence | |
Make | Humber | Renault |
Model | Super Snipe | Fluence |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2965 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 140 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4618 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1809 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1478 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2702 mm |