1964 Innocenti IM 3 vs. 1968 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 1968 Zastava 850 K is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Innocenti IM 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Innocenti IM 3 would be higher. At 1,096 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Innocenti IM 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Innocenti IM 3 (56 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Innocenti IM 3 should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Innocenti IM 3 weights approximately 35 kg more than 1968 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Zastava 850 K is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Zastava 850 K. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Innocenti IM 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Innocenti IM 3 | 1968 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Innocenti | Zastava |
| Model | IM 3 | 850 K |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 1096 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 56 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2010 mm |
