1964 Innocenti IM 3 vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Innocenti IM 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Innocenti IM 3 would be higher. At 1,594 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1964 Innocenti IM 3. (56 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1964 Innocenti IM 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 455 kg more than 1964 Innocenti IM 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (240 Nm) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Innocenti IM 3. (83 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Innocenti IM 3.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Innocenti IM 3 | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Innocenti | Mazda |
Model | IM 3 | 6 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1096 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2610 mm |