1964 Isuzu Bellel vs. 1982 Zastava 2101
To start off, 1982 Zastava 2101 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,990 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Isuzu Bellel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Zastava 2101 (62 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1964 Isuzu Bellel. (55 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Zastava 2101 should accelerate faster than 1964 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Isuzu Bellel weights approximately 370 kg more than 1982 Zastava 2101.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Isuzu Bellel (121 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1964 Isuzu Bellel will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 2101.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Isuzu Bellel | 1982 Zastava 2101 | |
Make | Isuzu | Zastava |
Model | Bellel | 2101 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 121 Nm | 87 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2430 mm |