1964 Isuzu Bellel vs. 1986 Honda Integra
To start off, 1986 Honda Integra is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,990 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Isuzu Bellel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Honda Integra (113 HP) has 58 more horse power than 1964 Isuzu Bellel. (55 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 1964 Isuzu Bellel.
Because 1964 Isuzu Bellel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Isuzu Bellel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1986 Honda Integra has automatic transmission and 1964 Isuzu Bellel has manual transmission. 1964 Isuzu Bellel will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1986 Honda Integra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Isuzu Bellel | 1986 Honda Integra | |
| Make | Isuzu | Honda |
| Model | Bellel | Integra |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 113 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4285 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1665 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2450 mm |
