1964 Isuzu Bellel vs. 1996 Lada 110
To start off, 1996 Lada 110 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,990 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Isuzu Bellel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lada 110 (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1964 Isuzu Bellel. (55 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lada 110 should accelerate faster than 1964 Isuzu Bellel.
Because 1964 Isuzu Bellel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Isuzu Bellel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lada 110, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Lada 110 (128 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Isuzu Bellel. (121 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1996 Lada 110 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Isuzu Bellel | 1996 Lada 110 | |
Make | Isuzu | Lada |
Model | Bellel | 110 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 121 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2500 mm |