1964 Isuzu Bellel vs. 1997 Toyota Sienna
To start off, 1997 Toyota Sienna is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Toyota Sienna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Toyota Sienna (194 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1964 Isuzu Bellel. (72 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Toyota Sienna should accelerate faster than 1964 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Toyota Sienna weights approximately 554 kg more than 1964 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Isuzu Bellel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Isuzu Bellel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Toyota Sienna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Toyota Sienna (284 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Isuzu Bellel. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1997 Toyota Sienna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Isuzu Bellel. 1997 Toyota Sienna has automatic transmission and 1964 Isuzu Bellel has manual transmission. 1964 Isuzu Bellel will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Toyota Sienna will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Isuzu Bellel | 1997 Toyota Sienna | |
| Make | Isuzu | Toyota |
| Model | Bellel | Sienna |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1491 cc | 2995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 194 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 112 Nm | 284 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.1 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1724 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2910 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 79 L |
