1964 Isuzu Bellel vs. 1998 Honda Integra
To start off, 1998 Honda Integra is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,990 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Isuzu Bellel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Honda Integra (197 HP) has 142 more horse power than 1964 Isuzu Bellel. (55 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 1964 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Isuzu Bellel weights approximately 131 kg more than 1998 Honda Integra.
Because 1964 Isuzu Bellel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Isuzu Bellel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Isuzu Bellel | 1998 Honda Integra | |
Make | Isuzu | Honda |
Model | Bellel | Integra |
Year Released | 1964 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 1199 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2570 mm |