1964 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2002 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2002 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1964 Isuzu Bellel. (55 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1964 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Isuzu Bellel weights approximately 45 kg more than 2002 Nissan X-Trail.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Isuzu Bellel. (121 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2002 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Isuzu Bellel | 2002 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Isuzu | Nissan |
| Model | Bellel | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 121 Nm | 192 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 1285 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 60 L |
