1964 Isuzu Minx vs. 2002 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 2002 Toyota Corolla is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Toyota Corolla is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Corolla (96 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1964 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Corolla should accelerate faster than 1964 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota Corolla weights approximately 140 kg more than 1964 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Corolla, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota Corolla (142 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2002 Toyota Corolla will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Isuzu Minx. 2002 Toyota Corolla has automatic transmission and 1964 Isuzu Minx has manual transmission. 1964 Isuzu Minx will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Toyota Corolla will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Isuzu Minx | 2002 Toyota Corolla | |
Make | Isuzu | Toyota |
Model | Minx | Corolla |
Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1491 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 84.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 55 L |