1964 Isuzu Minx vs. 2008 Volvo S60

To start off, 2008 Volvo S60 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,983 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo S60 weights approximately 410 kg more than 1964 Isuzu Minx.

Because 1964 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo S60 (240 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Isuzu Minx.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Isuzu Minx 2008 Volvo S60
Make Isuzu Volvo
Model Minx S60
Year Released 1964 2008
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1491 cc 1983 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 62 HP 0 HP
Torque 112 Nm 240 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 2200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 79 mm 81 mm
Engine Stroke Size 75 mm 77 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.3:1 9.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1030 kg 1440 kg
Vehicle Length 4120 mm 4250 mm
Vehicle Height 1520 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2440 mm 2720 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 40 L 70 L