1964 Isuzu Minx vs. 2010 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2010 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 2,696 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 SsangYong Rexton (161 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1964 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1964 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 942 kg more than 1964 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Isuzu Minx. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 SsangYong Rexton (345 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 233 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Isuzu Minx. 2010 SsangYong Rexton has automatic transmission and 1964 Isuzu Minx has manual transmission. 1964 Isuzu Minx will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 SsangYong Rexton will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Isuzu Minx | 2010 SsangYong Rexton | |
Make | Isuzu | SsangYong |
Model | Minx | Rexton |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1491 cc | 2696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 345 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 86.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 92.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 17.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1972 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 80 L |