1964 Isuzu Minx vs. 2011 Mercury Milan
To start off, 2011 Mercury Milan is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mercury Milan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mercury Milan weights approximately 661 kg more than 1964 Isuzu Minx.
Because 1964 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mercury Milan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Isuzu Minx | 2011 Mercury Milan | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mercury |
| Model | Minx | Milan |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1491 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1691 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4801 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1834 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1445 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2728 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 64 L |
