1964 Isuzu Minx vs. 2013 Ford Flex
To start off, 2013 Ford Flex is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Flex (281 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 1964 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 1964 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Flex weights approximately 1076 kg more than 1964 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Ford Flex is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Isuzu Minx. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Flex will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Flex (346 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2013 Ford Flex will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Isuzu Minx. 2013 Ford Flex has automatic transmission and 1964 Isuzu Minx has manual transmission. 1964 Isuzu Minx will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Ford Flex will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Isuzu Minx | 2013 Ford Flex | |
| Make | Isuzu | Ford |
| Model | Minx | Flex |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1491 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 281 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 112 Nm | 346 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 2106 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 5125 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 2256 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1726 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2994 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 70 L |
