1964 Jaguar E-Type vs. 1986 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1986 Toyota Celica is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jaguar E-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jaguar E-Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Jaguar E-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Jaguar E-Type (265 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1986 Toyota Celica. (115 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Jaguar E-Type should accelerate faster than 1986 Toyota Celica.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Jaguar E-Type (385 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Toyota Celica. (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1964 Jaguar E-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Jaguar E-Type | 1986 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
Model | E-Type | Celica |
Year Released | 1964 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4235 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 385 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92.1 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 75 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2620 mm |