1964 Jaguar E-Type vs. 1995 Saab 900
To start off, 1995 Saab 900 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jaguar E-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jaguar E-Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Jaguar E-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Jaguar E-Type (265 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1995 Saab 900. (224 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Jaguar E-Type should accelerate faster than 1995 Saab 900.
Because 1964 Jaguar E-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Jaguar E-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Saab 900, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Jaguar E-Type (385 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Saab 900. (350 Nm). This means 1964 Jaguar E-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Saab 900. 1995 Saab 900 has automatic transmission and 1964 Jaguar E-Type has manual transmission. 1964 Jaguar E-Type will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Saab 900 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Jaguar E-Type | 1995 Saab 900 | |
Make | Jaguar | Saab |
Model | E-Type | 900 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4235 cc | 2290 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 224 HP |
Torque | 385 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |