1964 Jaguar E-Type vs. 2005 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XJ is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jaguar E-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jaguar E-Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Jaguar E-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XJ (294 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1964 Jaguar E-Type. (265 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1964 Jaguar E-Type. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 570 kg more than 1964 Jaguar E-Type. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XJ (411 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Jaguar E-Type. (385 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Jaguar E-Type. 2005 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1964 Jaguar E-Type has manual transmission. 1964 Jaguar E-Type will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Jaguar E-Type | 2005 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Jaguar | Jaguar |
Model | E-Type | XJ |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4235 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 294 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 385 Nm | 411 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92.1 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 85 L |