1964 Jaguar E-Type vs. 2005 Suzuki XL7
To start off, 2005 Suzuki XL7 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jaguar E-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jaguar E-Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Jaguar E-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Jaguar E-Type (265 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2005 Suzuki XL7. (185 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Jaguar E-Type should accelerate faster than 2005 Suzuki XL7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Suzuki XL7 weights approximately 500 kg more than 1964 Jaguar E-Type.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Jaguar E-Type (385 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Suzuki XL7. (250 Nm). This means 1964 Jaguar E-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Suzuki XL7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Jaguar E-Type | 2005 Suzuki XL7 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Suzuki |
| Model | E-Type | XL7 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4235 cc | 2736 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 265 HP | 185 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 385 Nm | 250 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 92.1 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1670 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2810 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 64 L |
