1964 Jaguar MK 10 vs. 1962 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1964 Jaguar MK 10 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Jaguar MK 10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Jaguar MK 10 (265 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Jaguar MK 10 should accelerate faster than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Jaguar MK 10 weights approximately 1383 kg more than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Jaguar MK 10 (385 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 353 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1964 Jaguar MK 10 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Jaguar MK 10 | 1962 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Jaguar | Suzuki |
Model | MK 10 | Fronte |
Year Released | 1964 | 1962 |
Engine Size | 4235 cc | 360 cc |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 385 Nm | 32 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1883 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2060 mm |