1964 Jaguar MK 10 vs. 1973 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1973 Triumph 2000 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jaguar MK 10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jaguar MK 10 would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Jaguar MK 10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Jaguar MK 10 (265 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1973 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Jaguar MK 10 should accelerate faster than 1973 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Jaguar MK 10 weights approximately 635 kg more than 1973 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Jaguar MK 10 (385 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1964 Jaguar MK 10 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Jaguar MK 10 | 1973 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Triumph |
| Model | MK 10 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4235 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 265 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 385 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1883 kg | 1248 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2700 mm |
