1964 Jaguar MK 10 vs. 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jaguar MK 10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jaguar MK 10 would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Jaguar MK 10 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Jaguar MK 10 weights approximately 403 kg more than 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Jaguar MK 10 | 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Jaguar | Oldsmobile |
Model | MK 10 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1964 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4235 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1883 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2760 mm |