1964 Jaguar MK 10 vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jaguar MK 10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jaguar MK 10 would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Jaguar MK 10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Jaguar MK 10 (265 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2004 Toyota 4Runner. (245 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Jaguar MK 10 should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 37 kg more than 1964 Jaguar MK 10.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Jaguar MK 10 (385 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota 4Runner. (382 Nm). This means 1964 Jaguar MK 10 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Jaguar MK 10 | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
| Model | MK 10 | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4235 cc | 3950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 265 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 385 Nm | 382 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1883 kg | 1920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 87 L |
