1964 Jaguar MK 10 vs. 2006 Opel Astra
To start off, 2006 Opel Astra is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jaguar MK 10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jaguar MK 10 would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Jaguar MK 10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Jaguar MK 10 (265 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 2006 Opel Astra. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Jaguar MK 10 should accelerate faster than 2006 Opel Astra.
Because 1964 Jaguar MK 10 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Jaguar MK 10. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Opel Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Jaguar MK 10 (385 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Opel Astra. (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1964 Jaguar MK 10 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Opel Astra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Jaguar MK 10 | 2006 Opel Astra | |
| Make | Jaguar | Opel |
| Model | MK 10 | Astra |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4235 cc | 1910 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 265 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 385 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 17.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1760 mm |
