1964 Jaguar MK 10 vs. 2010 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2010 Chrysler 300 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jaguar MK 10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jaguar MK 10 would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Jaguar MK 10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Jaguar MK 10 (265 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2010 Chrysler 300. (250 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Jaguar MK 10 should accelerate faster than 2010 Chrysler 300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Jaguar MK 10 (385 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Chrysler 300. (339 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1964 Jaguar MK 10 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Jaguar MK 10 | 2010 Chrysler 300 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Chrysler |
| Model | MK 10 | 300 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4235 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 265 HP | 250 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 385 Nm | 339 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4999 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1882 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1483 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 3048 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 68 L |
