1964 Jaguar MK 10 vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jaguar MK 10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jaguar MK 10 would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Jaguar MK 10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Jaguar MK 10 (265 HP) has 28 more horse power than 2012 Jaguar XF. (237 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Jaguar MK 10 should accelerate faster than 2012 Jaguar XF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Jaguar MK 10. (385 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Jaguar MK 10.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Jaguar MK 10 | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Jaguar | Jaguar |
Model | MK 10 | XF |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4235 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 237 HP |
Torque | 385 Nm | 500 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 70 L |