1964 Jaguar MK 10 vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jaguar MK 10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jaguar MK 10 would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Jaguar MK 10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1964 Jaguar MK 10. (265 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1964 Jaguar MK 10.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Jaguar MK 10. (385 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Jaguar MK 10.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Jaguar MK 10 | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Jaguar | Jaguar |
Model | MK 10 | XF |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4235 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 271 HP |
Torque | 385 Nm | 600 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 70 L |