1964 Jaguar MK II vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Clio (251 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1964 Jaguar MK II. (120 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1964 Jaguar MK II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Clio weights approximately 80 kg more than 1964 Jaguar MK II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Clio (300 Nm @ 4650 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Jaguar MK II. (196 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2003 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Jaguar MK II.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Jaguar MK II | 2003 Renault Clio | |
Make | Jaguar | Renault |
Model | MK II | Clio |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2483 cc | 2946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 251 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 7150 RPM |
Torque | 196 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4650 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 82.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 60 L |