1964 Jaguar MK II vs. 2012 Nissan Note
To start off, 2012 Nissan Note is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Jaguar MK II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Jaguar MK II (120 HP) has 31 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Note. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Jaguar MK II should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Note. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Jaguar MK II weights approximately 398 kg more than 2012 Nissan Note. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Jaguar MK II is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Jaguar MK II. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Note, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Jaguar MK II | 2012 Nissan Note | |
Make | Jaguar | Nissan |
Model | MK II | Note |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2483 cc | 1386 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1052 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1691 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2600 mm |