1964 Jaguar MK X vs. 2002 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2002 Mini Cooper is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Jaguar MK X (252 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2002 Mini Cooper. (163 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2002 Mini Cooper.
Because 1964 Jaguar MK X is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Jaguar MK X. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Jaguar MK X (361 Nm) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mini Cooper. (210 Nm). This means 1964 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Jaguar MK X | 2002 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Jaguar | Mini |
Model | MK X | Cooper |
Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3781 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 361 Nm | 210 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2470 mm |