1964 Jaguar MK X vs. 2005 BMW 630

To start off, 2005 BMW 630 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW 630 (254 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1964 Jaguar MK X. (252 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW 630 should accelerate faster than 1964 Jaguar MK X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Jaguar MK X weights approximately 325 kg more than 2005 BMW 630.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Jaguar MK X (361 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 BMW 630. (290 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1964 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 BMW 630.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Jaguar MK X 2005 BMW 630
Make Jaguar BMW
Model MK X 630
Year Released 1964 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3781 cc 2993 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 252 HP 254 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6600 RPM
Torque 361 Nm 290 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1890 kg 1565 kg
Vehicle Length 5130 mm 4830 mm
Vehicle Width 1930 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2900 mm 2730 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.6 L/100km 9.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 70 L