1964 Jaguar MK X vs. 2009 Jeep Patriot
To start off, 2009 Jeep Patriot is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jaguar MK X would be higher. In terms of performance, 1964 Jaguar MK X (252 HP) has 104 more horse power than 2009 Jeep Patriot. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2009 Jeep Patriot.
Because 1964 Jaguar MK X is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Jaguar MK X. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Patriot, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Jaguar MK X | 2009 Jeep Patriot | |
Make | Jaguar | Jeep |
Model | MK X | Patriot |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 148 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |