1964 Jaguar MK X vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz S
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz S is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 5,980 cc, 2009 Mercedes-Benz S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz S (604 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 352 more horse power than 1964 Jaguar MK X. (252 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz S should accelerate faster than 1964 Jaguar MK X.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz S (1,000 Nm @ 200 RPM) has 639 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Jaguar MK X. (361 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz S will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Jaguar MK X.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Jaguar MK X | 2009 Mercedes-Benz S | |
Make | Jaguar | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | MK X | S |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3781 cc | 5980 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 604 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 361 Nm | 1000 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3170 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 14.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 90 L |