1964 Jaguar MK X vs. 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR
To start off, 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,064 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 812 more horse power than 1964 Jaguar MK X. (252 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR should accelerate faster than 1964 Jaguar MK X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Jaguar MK X weights approximately 610 kg more than 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,060 Nm @ 6100 RPM) has 699 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Jaguar MK X. (361 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Jaguar MK X.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Jaguar MK X | 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR | |
Make | Jaguar | Koenigsegg |
Model | MK X | CCXR |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3781 cc | 4719 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 1064 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Torque | 361 Nm | 1060 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 22 L/100km |